Skip to main content

Shame on us

For the record, the ambiguous title of this blog could also be read as "Shame on the US."  I could not bring myself to publish this short blog for the last 5 long months, but here it is. The dual nightmare of tRump and his Jan 6, 2021, brutal insurrection, that prompted me to start writing is gone.  But otherwise little has changed. We are still the same completely confused, mostly blind and illiterate animals that call themselves Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Wise wise man!).  My cat has more common sense and sees nature around him more acutely than most of us.

May 28, 2021. According to my friend Brian, some dudes in Nevada got curious about a bristle cone pine tree. It was really big. They cut it down. It was the oldest formerly alive tree in the world, ca. 6000 years. This tree was older than the oldest recorded dynasty in Egypt. It was older by at least 1000 years than the oldest surviving wood structure inside of an Egyptian pyramid. Eighteen years ago, that wooden structure led me to propose an operational definition of eternity for a human civilization (5000 years). And a few criminally stupid hominids (human-like apes) with chain saws murdered it. Just like that.  Within a few hours of their empty worthless lives that will be swallowed by time without a single ripple. As if though these disgusting creatures never existed.  Now California can lay claim to the oldest living tree. These, I am sorry to say, Nevadans are still peeved. Well, around 13 of them are.  I propose to rename our species to Homo Stultus Stultus or Homo Praedator Incinerātor.

Although Sudan was the last male white rhino, he was not, actually, the last of his kind. He still had two living descendants, both female: Najin, a daughter, and Fatu, a granddaughter. As Sudan declined, these two stood grazing in a nearby field. They would live out their days in a strange existential twilight — a state of limbo that scientists call, with heartbreaking dryness, “functional extinction.” Their subspecies was no longer viable. Two females, all by themselves, would not be able to save it. 

Jack Davison for The New York Times

My friend, Rex Weyler, just sent me these words from his recently deceased friend, Barry Lopez: “We are pattern makers, and if our patterns are beautiful and full of grace, they will be able to bring a person for whom the world has become broken and disorganized up off his knees and back to life.” Also: “For some people, who they imagine they are does not end where the boundary of the skin meets the world. It continues with the reach of their senses out into the land. If the land in which they live is summarily disfigured or reorganized by industrial development, it causes them psychological pain.”  

Pain, a heart-ripping ache is what I feel writing these words. I hope that you too can weep for these magnificent gentle rhinos, and pray for them and for our ravaged planet Earth.  When I say, "pray, " I mean it in the spiritual sense, not necessarily as a religious ritual. 

Which leads me to wanting to answer in more detail this question John S. asked in a comment to the previous blog: "Professor Patzek, why would any rational human try to live in harmony with nature if that human believed God was a construct invented out of emotional necessity? Would not the human reasonably choose to grab everything for itself?"  My answer is, and why not!?

Let me start from an anecdote.  A friend of mine reported that his partner just spoke to her 87-year old mother, who exclaimed: "I'm sick of praying; it's time for someone to act!" So how can we act to leave only the beautiful ripples across a blink of time that is given to us on the Earth?

How many times have you heard this tired cliché: "Our thought and prayers go to those who just tragically died."  (In yet another (1/9/2021) murderous rampage, while the bodies of the victims are still warm)?  Well, are merely our thoughts and prayers with the dying rhinos?  With the Earth under siege? Or should we do something?  If so, what are our main motivations?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ascent of the Angry and Stupid

Scientifically speaking,  stupid  people harm themselves while also harming others. In addition, stupid people are irrational and erratic, and are very dangerous to others. After discussing the destructive role of the stupid in any society whatsoever, I will focus on the delicate interplay of actions of intelligent and helpless people, who in balance make or break a functioning democracy.  Unless things change fast in the US, we can kiss our democracy goodbye for decades. If you want to see how a virulent ascent of the stupid looks up close, and what implications it has for our fight against social injustice and climate change, please watch the brilliant " Don't Look Up " movie. Unvaccinated people demonstrating in Los Angeles. There are tens of millions of the raving mad and/or angry, stupid people in the US and other developed countries. Source: New York Times , 12/25/2021. I overlapped at UC Berkeley with Professor Carlo M. Cipolla for a decade, until his death in t

Confessions of a Petroleum Engineer and Ecologist

I just attended an SPE workshop, "Oil and Gas Technology for a Net-Zero World – Defining Our Grand Challenges for the Next Decade."  Of the 60 people in the audience, I knew 1/3, some very well.  It makes sense, because I have been an SPE member for 40 years, and a Distinguished Member for 20 years.  Last year, I received an SPE EOR/IOR Pioneer Award for my work at Shell and UC Berkeley on the thermal enhanced oil recovery processes that involved foams, and their upscaling to field operations. This was nice, because Shell recognized me as one of their best reservoir engineers, and in 1985 I received an internal Shell Recognition Award for the same work. But I am not a mere oil & gas reservoir engineer.  First and foremost, I am a chemical engineer and physicist, who has thought rigorously about the sustainability of human civilization , ecology and thermodynamics of industrial agriculture and large biofuel systems, as well as about the overall gross and net primary produc

Net Ecosystem Productivity is Zero on Planet Earth

In the last bog , I told you how the law of mass conservation governs the large-scale behavior of Earth's households - ecosystems - that must recycle all mass on average and export only low quality heat into the cold universe.  Now, I will give you a few useful definitions of cyclic processes, sustainability, and ecosystem productivity. Let me start from stating the obvious:  We live in a spaceship we cannot leave, a gorgeous blue, white and green planet Earth that takes us for a spin around her star, the Sun, each year. But this statement is imprecise. We really live on a vanishingly thin skin of the Earth, her ecosphere .   Think of this skin as of a thin delicate membrane, teaming with life and beauty, but incredibly fragile. We trample on this membrane and poison it.  Then we act surprised when it brakes and shrivels. Practically all life on the Earth exists between two concentric spheres defined by the mean Earth surface at the radial distance from the Earth's