GMO foods revisited

So, we had the WSJ raving about applying good science to evaluate the undeniable benefits of GMOs, and we also had little shreds of evidence to the contrary.

In India, for example, they found a couple of tiny, irrelevant problems with a GMO eggplant designed so marvelously by Monsanto. Nonsense, I say! But here is what those pesky Indians say. Oops!

And Monsanto's Roundup, what a God send it has been for our hard working farmers and consumers! Or is it? Is it, really?!

I say, I am getting confused. But my liver, and heart, and kidneys, and lungs, and hormones seem to know something. And they all refuse to accept the GMO blessings. They are wrong, I say! The science I don't like is junk science. And WSJ confirms. What a relief...

Comments

Ascent of the Angry and Stupid

Scientifically speaking, stupid people harm themselves while also harming others. In addition, stupid people are irrational and erratic, and are very dangerous to others. After discussing the destructive role of the stupid in any society whatsoever, I will focus on the delicate interplay of actions of intelligent and helpless people, who in balance make or break a functioning democracy. Unless things change fast in the US, we can kiss our democracy goodbye for decades. If you want to see how a virulent ascent of the stupid looks up close, and what implications it has for our fight against social injustice and climate change, please watch the brilliant " Don't Look Up " movie. Unvaccinated people demonstrating in Los Angeles. There are tens of millions of the raving mad and/or angry, stupid people in the US and other developed countries. Source: New York Times , 12/25/2021. I overlapped at UC Berkeley with Professor Carlo M. Cipolla for a decade, until his death in t...

Confessions of a Petroleum Engineer and Ecologist

I just attended an SPE workshop, "Oil and Gas Technology for a Net-Zero World – Defining Our Grand Challenges for the Next Decade." Of the 60 people in the audience, I knew 1/3, some very well. It makes sense, because I have been an SPE member for 40 years, and a Distinguished Member for 20 years. Last year, I received an SPE EOR/IOR Pioneer Award for my work at Shell and UC Berkeley on the thermal enhanced oil recovery processes that involved foams, and their upscaling to field operations. This was nice, because Shell recognized me as one of their best reservoir engineers, and in 1985 I received an internal Shell Recognition Award for the same work. But I am not a mere oil & gas reservoir engineer. First and foremost, I am a chemical engineer and physicist, who has thought rigorously about the sustainability of human civilization , ecology and thermodynamics of industrial agriculture and large biofuel systems, as well as about the overall gross and net prima...

The Ghost of Julian Simon

The essence of my unchanging argument is as follows: An exponential growth of human population can be supported for a while by a similarly exponential increase of production of power as primary energy per unit time and food we must eat each day. After a certain time interval , whose length depends on the rate of population growth and technology, both the population and the means of its survival must stabilize or collapse. The elapsed time to collapse depends strongly on the rate of deterioration of environmental services of the Earth: abundance of clean air, water, good soil, large healthy forests, and biodiversity in general, as well as on the healthy oceans. Please note the two key phrases: "for a while" and "a certain time interval." My argument is generally rejected, because most people focus on the here and now, and forget that a few decades are less than a blink of an eye in history of humanity. In the more sophisticated circles of "main-stream...

LifeItself

Search This Blog