Skip to main content

Tales of Two Earths

...As sheep, that step from forth their fold, by one,
Or pairs, or three at once; meanwhile the rest
Stand fearfully, bending the eye and nose
To ground, and what the foremost does, that do
The others, gath'ring round her, if she stops...

Dante Alighieri, Purgatorio, Canto 14

Most economists make it all too easy to bash them. When I think of how eerily detached from reality the main stream of economics is, I also recall the situation with corn ethanol in 2005.  Only two U.S. faculty, Dr. David Pimentel and I, went public against the nonsense that was being propagated throughout the society by the ill-informed greens, scientists, lobbyists, economists, venture-capitalists, lawmakers, and almost everyone in the media.  We were both savaged at the time and for a few more years.  Now everybody shrugs their arms and says pretty much what we were saying all along. 

Today, Chapter 2 of the same nonsense, or the "second generation biofuels," is being closed at a great cost to the society and the environment.  Shell finally pulled the plug on Iogen in Ottawa, 5 years after I had presented ample evidence against Iogen in the presence of the highest Shell management.  Amyris in Berkeley, an offspring of the BP-Berkeley-Monsanto-DuPont bout of greed, is in its final death throws.  Again, 5 years ago, I was on record showing the nonsensical assumptions behind that deal.  In no small measure my opposition to the doomed yet harmful GMOs-for-biofuels hastened my departure from the biotechnology-crazed, irrational Berkeley.

Here I'll use but one of a multitude of recent examples that illustrate what's wrong with main-stream economics implemented with vengeance by nation-states, IMF, and the particularly harmful World Bank. This example is  "Never Mind Europe. Worry About India," by Dr. Tyler Cowen, published by the New York Times in the Sunday Business Section on May 5, 2012. I have picked this particular example, because Dr. Cowen's arguments are identical to the talking points used to neutralize my public activities over the last 8 years. I guess there must be a single master list of standard arguments of the Free Marketians.

According to Dr. Cowen's auto-panegyric in Wikipidia, he occupies the Holbert C. Harris Chair of economics as a professor at George Mason University and is co-author, with Alex Tabarrok, of the popular economics blog "Marginal Revolution." He currently writes the "Economic Scene" column for the New York Times, and he also writes for such publications as The New Republic, The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Newsweek, and The Wilson Quarterly. Cowen is also general director of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. In February 2011, Cowen received a nomination as one of the most influential economists in the last decade through a survey by the Economist. He was placed #72 as the most influential Thinkers of 2011 by Foreign Policy Magazine.

Try to imagine over 7 billion people, who are at once less thoughtful and mean less than Dr. Cowen to the prosperous future of the ever-growing Global Economy. What an unbearably heavy weight to carry on one's economic and political shoulders!

The foundation of Dr. Cowen's argument is that

"China’s population is likely to peak relatively soon while India’s will continue to grow, so under even modestly optimistic projections the Indian economy will be No. 1 in terms of total size."

But, while nicely exploding her population, India has made some fatal missteps that slow down her progress towards economic bliss:
  • They did not let Wal-Mart in.
  • The glorious green revolution has eluded them.
  • They do not mine enough coal and do not generate enough electricity to grow the economy even faster.
  • They ceased growing their service economy because "call centers, for example, have succeeded by building their own infrastructure and they often function as self-contained, walled minicities." 
  • And so on...
Unfortunately, Dr. Cowen never mentions the physical Earth and her ecosystems that no longer can save the bulging Indians from themselves:
  •  A population explosion to 1.5 or 2 billion people tests the carrying capacity of the Earth, not just the Indian subcontinent - with or without Wal-Mart.
  • Using intensive and sustainable agriculture, India, China and Japan were able to feed themselves for two thousand years before anyone could spell "Monsanto."  Today, the 800 million people who live off of land in India are more than the populations of Europe and North America combined. They cannot be replaced by huge machines, Monsanto's patented self-destructing GMO seeds, and lots of water and chemicals.
  • Groundwater and river water are running out in India, and no longer support people's lives, agriculture, and coal mining.
  •  Indian coal generally has a high sulfur content and is not suitable to use for power generation.
In summary, Dr. Cowen is a card-carrying member of the powerful, omnipresent Society of Flat Earth Economists (SOFEE) that now controls most if not all departments of economics in the U.S. His arguments for growth would hold only if the Earth were flat and infinite, her resources were infinite, and her capacity to absorb and process human-made toxins were also infinite. Unfortunately, none of these conditions obtains on our physically observable planet.


  1. lol yes indeed!
    It is like economists say this about India because they want to claim they 'called' the next China. They will fail simply because they can't recognise the physical limits that currently restrain 1 billion Indians reaching Chinese (let alone Western) consumption levels.

    It will be interesting how the perspective of economists change (or don't change) with the peaking of Chinese coal production. We will hear endlessly about the 'Chinese debt bubble' and 'too low levels of domestic consumption'. The cause will be much simpler: they hit physical limits.

  2. I just joined. I'll try to read your blog regularly. In a way, classical economists are to the people who live in industrial societies what the theologians on Easter island were to its residents. As a culture we are awash in illusions some of which are regarded as orthodoxy.

  3. Tad, I agree strongly with the main thrust of this posting, but I do disagree with one point you made:
    "Using intensive and sustainable agriculture, India, China and Japan were able to feed themselves for two thousand years before anyone could spell "Monsanto.""
    I don't have a reference readily at hand, but I think that you will find that the 2000 years of agricultural history of China (and of most of the rest of the world) was characterized by frequent, recurring famines and starvation.
    Roy Hagen

  4. Indeed, Roy. There was hardly a year without famine in one or more provinces in China. However, we now know more about storage and transportation, as well as meteorology and pest control. Thus, I would hope, we would be able to do better than the ancient Chinese.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Requiem for the Beautiful Earth

First, let me remind you that a pessimist is an optimist who shed his delusions and denial, and educated himself. Please keep this in mind, if you continue reading. If you don't, that's fine too. You will remain in your blissful bubble of denial and ignorance, which are the dominant genetic traits of most denizens of the fossil superorganism. Please understand that many democratically elected governments know very well about your truth aversion and are making best use of it.

Imagine now that your favorite airline offers a vacation package to a world-class city like the one shown below. That city is Beijing. China is the rising economic superpower that will collapse rather immediately, because there is not enough of the environment left to protect her 1.4 billion people from disease and death. But before China collapses, she will suck dry most of the world that remains. The brutal global competition for resources may precipitate a war between China and US.

By the way, a famous …

Green New Deal II - Population growth and control

In Part I of this blog, I explained difficulties with comprehending the astronomical scale of change that is awaiting us, the rich people in the developed countries, in our journey to a more sustainable, greener future of humankind.  I have also pointed out a few of the many ways people escape responsibility for the crimes against the Earth we  - you and I - have committed.  And, please, let's not blame the poor people in Honduras or Gabon for our sins, plastic in the oceans and greenhouse gas emissions.

Exponential growth.  Remember a lonely lily pad floating on an empty pond?  She multiplied daily, so after day one, there were two lilies; after two days, four lilies; then eight; and so on.  After 20 days, there were 1,048,576 lilies. After 21 days, there were  2,097,152 lilies that covered the pond, exhausted nutrients and died. Question: After which day was the pond half-filled?  You already know the answer, it was day 20.  On that fateful day, 95% of the time allotted to our li…

The New Green Revolution, a.k.a. The Grand Transition to... ?? - Part I

Jeff Bezos,Elon Musk and others have been touting the multitudinous advantages of colonizing the Moon and Mars. The scientific idiocies of these proclamations are so outlandish that I will not bother commenting on them. But, at the same time, Stephen Hawking's name has come up in the context of Mars colonization.

Dr. Nate Hagens uses Hawking's ideas about Mars colonization in his Reality 101 course at the University of Minnesota to illustrate the point that human society is composed of tiny islands of high competence floating in a vast sea of narratives.

Let me start from quoting a recent email by JDW on the subject of human escape to outer space:

"Without a synthesis which shows how different narratives relate to one another, people are free to use “verbal logic” to create properly-constructed sentences which don’t correspond to possible realities. “Verbal logic” is nearly an oxymoron, because there’s not much in the way of error-correction built into it. Anything that …